<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul&#8217;s Revenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/ron-pauls-revenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/ron-pauls-revenge/</link>
	<description>Free will. Free market. What's so hard to understand about that?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:28:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kylehuwer</title>
		<link>http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/ron-pauls-revenge/#comment-3041</link>
		<dc:creator>kylehuwer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/?p=403#comment-3041</guid>
		<description>Why is the problem with &lt;i&gt;Ron Paul&lt;/i&gt; when it is the &lt;i&gt;voters&lt;/i&gt; who cannot see that he was the one that aligns itself most with the traditional conservative platform?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the problem with <i>Ron Paul</i> when it is the <i>voters</i> who cannot see that he was the one that aligns itself most with the traditional conservative platform?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/ron-pauls-revenge/#comment-2150</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/?p=403#comment-2150</guid>
		<description>&quot;Reagan WAS a conservative, I have never waivered from that&quot;

Except when presented with the FACTS of the fiscal irresponsibility of the GOP &amp; the &quot;conservatives&quot; therein.

As for &quot;spinning&quot;...your projecting again &quot;DJ&quot;, but what else is new eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Reagan WAS a conservative, I have never waivered from that&#8221;</p>
<p>Except when presented with the FACTS of the fiscal irresponsibility of the GOP &amp; the &#8220;conservatives&#8221; therein.</p>
<p>As for &#8220;spinning&#8221;&#8230;your projecting again &#8220;DJ&#8221;, but what else is new eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/ron-pauls-revenge/#comment-2138</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/?p=403#comment-2138</guid>
		<description>&quot;GHWB was a “neo-conservative”?? That must be news to him.&quot;

I doubt it is news to him.  Face it Comrade Guy, you don&#039;t know the difference between Conservatives and Neo-Conservatives do you.  Reagan WAS a conservative, I have never waivered from that, but you keep spinning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;GHWB was a “neo-conservative”?? That must be news to him.&#8221;</p>
<p>I doubt it is news to him.  Face it Comrade Guy, you don&#8217;t know the difference between Conservatives and Neo-Conservatives do you.  Reagan WAS a conservative, I have never waivered from that, but you keep spinning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/ron-pauls-revenge/#comment-2131</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/?p=403#comment-2131</guid>
		<description>&quot;Reagan was a Conservative&quot;

Oh, so we&#039;re gonna backpeddle on that one now??  Give me a break &quot;DJ&quot;...you&#039;ve completely twisted yourself into a pretzel on this issue.  The fact is that the GOP has not been able to balance the federal budget and/or exhibit REAL fiscal responsibility in a very, very long time (if ever).

&quot;Both Bushs fall into the Neo-Conservative catergory&quot;

GHWB was a &quot;neo-conservative&quot;??  That must be news to him.  

&quot;One world Goernment, with the seat in the UN.&quot;

Enjoy those conspiracy theories...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Reagan was a Conservative&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, so we&#8217;re gonna backpeddle on that one now??  Give me a break &#8220;DJ&#8221;&#8230;you&#8217;ve completely twisted yourself into a pretzel on this issue.  The fact is that the GOP has not been able to balance the federal budget and/or exhibit REAL fiscal responsibility in a very, very long time (if ever).</p>
<p>&#8220;Both Bushs fall into the Neo-Conservative catergory&#8221;</p>
<p>GHWB was a &#8220;neo-conservative&#8221;??  That must be news to him.  </p>
<p>&#8220;One world Goernment, with the seat in the UN.&#8221;</p>
<p>Enjoy those conspiracy theories&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stecha</title>
		<link>http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/ron-pauls-revenge/#comment-2123</link>
		<dc:creator>Stecha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/?p=403#comment-2123</guid>
		<description>yochanan, libertarians are not isolationist. We do believe the governments job is to serve AMERICANS however. Therefore foreign policy would be based on what is best for Americans. Obviously that is no isolationism, in fact it is almost opposite in the economy as a libertarian government would not get in the way of Americans doing what is best for them. It would give free trade a whole new meaning. The only things that really change in foreign affairs is less regulations on trade, allowing other people to live as they wish as long as they allow us too, and foreign aid would come from the people who want to send it not from our tax dollars. We would still be involved in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yochanan, libertarians are not isolationist. We do believe the governments job is to serve AMERICANS however. Therefore foreign policy would be based on what is best for Americans. Obviously that is no isolationism, in fact it is almost opposite in the economy as a libertarian government would not get in the way of Americans doing what is best for them. It would give free trade a whole new meaning. The only things that really change in foreign affairs is less regulations on trade, allowing other people to live as they wish as long as they allow us too, and foreign aid would come from the people who want to send it not from our tax dollars. We would still be involved in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/ron-pauls-revenge/#comment-2122</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/?p=403#comment-2122</guid>
		<description>Reagan was a Conservative, neither Bush is.  Both Bushs fall into the Neo-Conservative catergory, which is basically an &quot;old money&quot; solialist, they, just like you want the same thing, One world Goernment, with the seat in the UN.  You are reduced to calling me &quot;intellectually dishonest&quot; that shows me you have no REAL argument left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reagan was a Conservative, neither Bush is.  Both Bushs fall into the Neo-Conservative catergory, which is basically an &#8220;old money&#8221; solialist, they, just like you want the same thing, One world Goernment, with the seat in the UN.  You are reduced to calling me &#8220;intellectually dishonest&#8221; that shows me you have no REAL argument left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/ron-pauls-revenge/#comment-2113</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/?p=403#comment-2113</guid>
		<description>&quot;I stipulated CONSERVATIVE.&quot;

Your posts &quot;DJ&quot; have now crossed over from the entirely humorous and into the pathetically sad.  Reagan and his own VP (&amp; sucessor) were NOT &quot;conservatives&quot;??  That&#039;s the most intellectually dishonest thing that you&#039;ve chosen to post here so far...congrats on that one!

As I stated before, you guys should be more worried about Barr &amp; not Paul...one of them will be one the ballot this fall &amp; the other won&#039;t!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I stipulated CONSERVATIVE.&#8221;</p>
<p>Your posts &#8220;DJ&#8221; have now crossed over from the entirely humorous and into the pathetically sad.  Reagan and his own VP (&amp; sucessor) were NOT &#8220;conservatives&#8221;??  That&#8217;s the most intellectually dishonest thing that you&#8217;ve chosen to post here so far&#8230;congrats on that one!</p>
<p>As I stated before, you guys should be more worried about Barr &amp; not Paul&#8230;one of them will be one the ballot this fall &amp; the other won&#8217;t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/ron-pauls-revenge/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/?p=403#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>The &quot;records&quot; you posted are based on Republican-Democrat party positions.  I stipulated CONSERVATIVE.  I know this will be difficult for Comrade Guy, but not all Republicans are Conservative, and not all Conservatives are Republican.  My posts, simply state that GOVERNOR Palin and GOVERNOR Jindal are Conservatives, RP has a Conservative message, since all are memebers of the Republican party, it gives true Conservatives a chance to gain control of the Republican party over the next few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;records&#8221; you posted are based on Republican-Democrat party positions.  I stipulated CONSERVATIVE.  I know this will be difficult for Comrade Guy, but not all Republicans are Conservative, and not all Conservatives are Republican.  My posts, simply state that GOVERNOR Palin and GOVERNOR Jindal are Conservatives, RP has a Conservative message, since all are memebers of the Republican party, it gives true Conservatives a chance to gain control of the Republican party over the next few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/ron-pauls-revenge/#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/?p=403#comment-2079</guid>
		<description>&quot;Can you provide a record to check?&quot;

Of course, not that you&#039;ll understand or interpret it correctly:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_debt_by_U.S._presidential_terms

zfacts.com/p/318.html

archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/09/27/clinton.surplus/

The last two Presidents to reduce the federal debt as a percentage of GDP (a favorite measure of the GOP)?  Clinton &amp; Carter...both Dems.

Who owns that all that debt?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Estimated_ownership_of_US_Treasury_securities_by_category.gif

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Foreign_Holders_of_United_States_Treasury_Securities-percent_share.gif

Mostly we still owe it to ourselves, but Japan, the UK, &amp; China hold the most of any foreign goverments.  

&quot;we now have a good starting point in which to get there.&quot;

What &quot;starting point&quot; would that be...the worst starting point in well over 50 years??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can you provide a record to check?&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, not that you&#8217;ll understand or interpret it correctly:</p>
<p>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_debt_by_U.S._presidential_terms</p>
<p>zfacts.com/p/318.html</p>
<p>archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/09/27/clinton.surplus/</p>
<p>The last two Presidents to reduce the federal debt as a percentage of GDP (a favorite measure of the GOP)?  Clinton &amp; Carter&#8230;both Dems.</p>
<p>Who owns that all that debt?</p>
<p>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Estimated_ownership_of_US_Treasury_securities_by_category.gif</p>
<p>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Foreign_Holders_of_United_States_Treasury_Securities-percent_share.gif</p>
<p>Mostly we still owe it to ourselves, but Japan, the UK, &amp; China hold the most of any foreign goverments.  </p>
<p>&#8220;we now have a good starting point in which to get there.&#8221;</p>
<p>What &#8220;starting point&#8221; would that be&#8230;the worst starting point in well over 50 years??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/2008/08/31/ron-pauls-revenge/#comment-2060</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notyourdaddy.wordpress.com/?p=403#comment-2060</guid>
		<description>&quot;check the record…&quot;

Can you provide a record to check?

The comment was been poorly written, my apologies, Conservatives desire small limited government with balanced budgets, we now have a good starting point in which to get there.

&quot;…oh, sorry, that would involve embracing facts over ideology…&quot;

Vice you, who embrace whatever Howard Dean e-mails you to embrace?  LOL, your quite funny Comrade Guy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;check the record…&#8221;</p>
<p>Can you provide a record to check?</p>
<p>The comment was been poorly written, my apologies, Conservatives desire small limited government with balanced budgets, we now have a good starting point in which to get there.</p>
<p>&#8220;…oh, sorry, that would involve embracing facts over ideology…&#8221;</p>
<p>Vice you, who embrace whatever Howard Dean e-mails you to embrace?  LOL, your quite funny Comrade Guy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
